
We began our quest for better measurements by starting with the most obviousĮrror: The Arctic Fan 12. The excerpt below from Laboratatory Methods of Testing Fans for Aerodynamic Performance Rating, document ANSI / AMCA STANDARD 210, shows just how complex such tools can be. The cost of these tools runs into many thousands of dollars, possibly into the tens of thousands. Are these differences real or errors caused by our measurement technique? With the feedback on the Noctua fans, we weren’t sure.įan manufacturers use complex multichamber testing tools to measure airflow. Ratio that is significantly different with other fans of similar size.
#Fan airflow direction pro#

We were surprised when reports began to surface that, while the Noctua was indeed NF-S12 series as the fan with the best airflow-to-noise ratio. Most recently, we identified the Noctua’s These situations don’t arise often, but we take
#Fan airflow direction full#
We make a recommendation, peopleįorum is full of people complaining that our recommendation didn’t Neither the photo nor this article would exist if it weren’t for theįact that, occasionally, we get things wrong. What is that in the photo below? Three guesses - no cheating!Ī hint? Remember the title of the article. After much experimentation and some test methods that were rejected, we settled on a new way of assessing fan airflow under some load (impedance) that seems more consistent and reliable. In spite of our best efforts, some SPCR readers found fault with a few of the airflow measurements in our recent fan roundups.
